A Filliou for the Game: From Political Economy to Poetical Economy and Fluxus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’humour qui caractérise l’oeuvre de Robert Filliou est conçu ici en tant qu’approche individuelle de l’artiste dans sa réflexion sur les méthodes iconoclastes et sur l’état d’esprit du groupe Fluxus. Notamment, l’oeuvre vidéo Breakfasting Together, If You Wish (1979) est présentée dans le contexte de concepts que Filliou avait développés dans ses projets antérieurs, dont la Galerie Légitime, le centre de Création Permanente, La cédille qui sourit, Teaching and Learning as Performing Arts, et Les principes d’économie poétique. Dans ses références à la réalité quotidienne et aux conditions de travail des artistes, Breakfasting Together fait preuve d’un sens de l’humour ironique qui relève autant de l’aliénation que de la créativité. C’est donc dans le champ de l’art que se déploie une vision poétique de la vie et de la résistance au côté sinistre de l’économie capitaliste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".