Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interior designers are often tasked with providing solutions for spaces that are defined as being inside. Interior design should not be limited to this condition. Spaces have qualities and characteristics that hold value, regardless of whether it is inside, outside, enclosed, or non-enclosed. This practicum project challenges this way of practice by exploring interior and exterior thresholds. The explorations of this project are presented through the design of a restaurant in the Assiniboine Forest, Winnipeg, Manitoba. This restaurant highlights the value the Assiniboine Forest has to offer and celebrates these qualities through all four seasons. The built environment highlights key research findings in interior and outdoor rooms, place-making, and thresholds. Ideas that are discussed in this project are influenced by theorists, researchers, and practitioners such as Christian Norberg-Schulz, Tim Cresswell, Jean Baudrillard, Jane Rendell, Teiji Ito, Barrie Greenbie, and Kengo Kuma, to name a few. I bring forward a design project that illustrates how interior designers can challenge the boundaries that lie between the realms of interior and exterior with particular reference to the conditions of Winnipeg.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".