Rich dynamics of a three-tiered anaerobic food-web in a chemostat with multiple substrate inflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mathematical analysis of a three-tiered food-web describing anaerobic chlorophenol mineralisation has suggested the emergence of interesting dynamical behaviour through its specific ecological interactions, which include competition, syntrophy, and product inhibition. Previous numerical analyses have revealed the possibility of a Hopf bifurcation at the interior equilibrium as well as the role of extraneous substrate inputs in both mitigating the emergence of periodic solutions and expanding the desired operating region where the positive steady-state is stable and full mineralisation occurs. Here we show that, for a generalised model, the inflow of multiple substrates results in greater dynamical complexity and show the occurrence of a supercritical Hopf bifurcation resulting from variations in these operating parameters. Further, using numerical estimation, we also show that variations in the dilution rate can lead to Bogdanov-Takens and Bautin bifurcations. Finally, we are able to apply persistence theory for a range of parameter sets to demonstrate persistence in cases where chlorophenol and hydrogen are extraneously added to the system, mirroring recent applied studies highlighting the role of hydrogen in maintaining stable anaerobic microbial communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".