MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006441058 · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1728099

LC3C mediates selective autophagy of the MET RTK, inhibiting cancer cell invasion

2020· article· en· W3006441058 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Bell, Paula P. Coelho, Morag Park

Bibliographic record

VenueAutophagy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAutophagyBiologyCell biologyReceptor tyrosine kinaseBAG3Signal transductionCancer cellCellCancerCancer researchBiochemistryApoptosisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macroautophagy/autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved degradative process with a central role in maintaining cellular homeostasis under conditions of stress, and recent evidence suggests this may occur in part through direct modification of cell signaling. The MET/HGF receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling axis is an important mediator of cell motility and invasion in normal cell functions and in cancer. We discovered a role for autophagy in regulating ligand-activated MET signaling and cellular responses. When autophagy is induced by starvation, the HGF-activated and internalized MET RTK is selectively recruited for autophagic degradation through complex formation with the MAP1LC3C autophagy protein. Decreased LC3C expression in cancer results in loss of autophagic degradation of MET and enhanced HGF-stimulated cell invasion implicated in metastatic progression. This emerging role for autophagy in selectively regulating signaling proteins has implications for understanding cellular adaptations to stress and the functions of autophagy at different stages of cancer progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutophagySame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207