MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3006445706 · doi:10.1101/2020.02.14.949750

Differentiating the Roles of UL16, UL21 and Us3 in the Nuclear Egress of Herpes Simplex Virus Capsids

2020· preprint· en· W3006445706 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Gao, Renée L. Finnen, Maxwell R. Sherry, Valerie Le Sage, Bruce W. Banfield

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsCapsidHerpes simplex virusBiologyVirusImmunofluorescenceVirologyUltrastructureCell biologyAntiserumNuclear localization sequenceAntibodyGeneticsCytoplasm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Previous studies from our laboratory established that pUL16 and pUL21 are required for efficient nuclear egress of herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2) capsids. To better understand the role of these proteins in nuclear egress, we wished to establish whether nuclear egress complex (NEC) localization and/or function was altered in the absence of either pUL16 or pUL21. We used antiserum raised against HSV-2 NEC components pUL31 and pUL34 to examine NEC localization by immunofluorescence microscopy. NEC localization in cells infected with pUL16 deficient viruses was indistinguishable from that observed in cells infected with wild type viruses. By contrast, NEC localization was found to be aberrant in cells infected with pUL21 deficient virus and, instead, showed some similarity to the aberrant NEC localization pattern observed in cells infected with pUs3 deficient virus. These results indicated that pUL16 plays a role in nuclear egress that is distinct from that of pUL21 and pUs3. Higher resolution examination of nuclear envelope ultrastructure in cells infected with pUL21 deficient viruses by transmission electron microscopy showed different types of nuclear envelope perturbations, including some that were not observed in cells infected with pUs3 deficient virus. The formation of the nuclear envelope perturbations observed in pUL21 deficient virus infections was found to be dependent on a functional NEC, revealing a novel role for pUL21 in regulating NEC activity. The results of comparisons of nuclear envelope ultrastructure in cells infected with viruses lacking pUs3, pUL16 or both pUs3 and pUL16 were consistent with a role for pUL16 upstream of primary capsid envelopment and shed new light on how pUs3 functions in nuclear egress. Author summary The membrane deformation activity of the herpesvirus nuclear egress complex (NEC), allows viral capsids to transit from their site of assembly in the nucleus through both nuclear membranes into the cytoplasm. The timing, extent and directionality of NEC activity must be precisely controlled during viral infection, yet our knowledge of how NEC activity is controlled is incomplete. To determine how pUL16 and pUL21, two viral proteins required for nuclear egress of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) capsids, function to promote nuclear egress, we examined how the lack of each protein impacted NEC localization. These analyses revealed a function of pUL16 in nuclear egress that is distinct from that of pUL21, uncovered a novel role for pUL21 in regulating NEC activity and shed new light on how a viral kinase, pUs3, regulates nuclear egress. Nuclear egress of viral capsids is a common feature of the replicative cycle of all herpesviruses. A complete understanding of all aspects of nuclear egress, including how viral NEC activity is controlled, may yield strategies to disrupt this process that could be applied to the development of herpes-specific antiviral drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→