MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006495386 · doi:10.1080/21594937.2020.1720142

Male Long Evans rats reared with a Fischer-344 peer during the juvenile period show deficits in social competency: a role for play

2020· article· en· W3006495386 on OpenAlex
Rachel Stark, Sergio M. Pellis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Play · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuvenilePeriod (music)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologyExecutive functionsCognitionBiologyNeuroscienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rats that are deprived of play during the juvenile period develop into adults that have a host of socio-cognitive impairments. Thus, it has been hypothesized that experiencing play fighting during the juvenile period refines executive functions. The present study assesses the social ability of adult, male Long-Evans hooded (LE) rats that have been reared with either a same age and sex LE rat or a Fischer-344 (F344), a low playing strain. As adults, their social skills were assessed. This was done by introducing each rat into a neutral arena with an unfamiliar partner. As predicted, rats from both conditions engaged the stranger in play, but the LE rats that had been reared with a F344 partner were more likely to escalate these playful interactions into aggressive ones. These findings support the hypothesis that play experience during the juvenile period is critical for the development of some executive functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it