Central cardiovascular system limits to aerobic capacity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the topic of this review? The limits to maximal aerobic capacity. What advances does it highlight? A synthesis of data and ideas about what limits maximal aerobic capacity demonstrates the central roles of cardiac output, stroke volume and red blood cell mass in the complex physiological responses to maximal exercise. In healthy humans these factors, along with skeletal muscle blood flow, dominate systemic delivery of oxygen to the contracting muscles and set the upper limit of aerobic energy production by skeletal muscles. In elite athletes and patients with pulmonary disease the lungs can also limit oxygen uptake and delivery. Abstract In this paper we review the physiological determinants of and discuss the role this variable plays as a determinant of endurance exercise performance. Because the ability to sustain a given pace during a competitive athletic event requires competitors to ‘manage’ fatigue and go as fast as possible without fatiguing prematurely, is one of the variables that sets the physiological upper limit for sustained energy production by the contracting skeletal muscles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it