MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006592866 · doi:10.1177/1687814020902321

Design of optimal quantity discounts for multi-period bilevel production planning under uncertain demands

2020· article· en· W3006592866 on OpenAlexaff
Okihiro Yoshida, Tatsushi Nishi, Guoqing Zhang, Jun Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mechanical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceBeijing Social Science FundBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStackelberg competitionBilevel optimizationSupply chainProduction (economics)Production planningOrder (exchange)Mathematical optimizationEconomic order quantityComputer scienceMicroeconomicsOperations researchEconomicsBusinessOptimization problemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of the quantity discount of the decentralized supply chain has been studied only for single-period planning models. This article presents the design of an optimal quantity discounts for multi-period bilevel production planning for two-echelon supply chains under demand uncertainty. In order to derive an optimal contract for multi-period production planning, the cumulative order quantity and production quantity are introduced. From our proposed model, a Stackelberg equilibrium is analytically derived for the supply chain when the supplier is the leader and the retailer is the follower. An optimal discount contract is analytically designed through the optimal solution of the centralized problem. Computational results show the effectiveness of the proposed discount contract under demand uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Mechanical EngineeringSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207