Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+sofosbuvir: an optimal retreatment strategy in the setting of HCV NS5A resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some individuals do not achieve a cure of their hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection due to non-adherence or resistance associated substitutions. Salvage options that are optimised for resistance profiles are essential. We report a 56-year-old Caucasian man with fatigue, depression and confusion in the setting of untreated HCV genotype 3a infection. He received ruzasvir and uprifosbuvir for 12 weeks within a clinical trial. The patient relapsed 4 weeks after the end of treatment and at this time resistance testing showed multiple resistances including a NS5A Y93H mutation. Given that this mutation confers resistance to first line salvage options, sofosbuvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was used for 12 weeks and the patient was cured of HCV infection 12 weeks after the end of treatment. This shows that sofosbuvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a viable, effective option for second line/salvage therapy of HCV infection in the setting of resistance to NS5A inhibitors with the Y93H mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".