Improving accuracy of the fifth-order WENO scheme by using the exponential approximation space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to develop a novel WENO scheme that improves the performance of the well-known fifth-order WENO methods. The approximation space consists of exponential polynomials with a tension parameter that may be optimized to fit the the specific feature of the data, yielding better results compared to the polynomial approximation space. However, finding an optimal tension parameter is a very important and difficult problem, indeed a topic of active research. In this regard, this study introduces a practical approach to determine an optimal tension parameter by taking into account the relationship between the tension parameter and the accuracy of the exponential polynomial interpolation under the setting of the fifth-order WENO scheme. As a result, the proposed WENO scheme attains an improved order of accuracy (that is, sixth-order) better than other fifth-order WENO methods without loss of accuracy at critical points. A detailed analysis is provided to verify the improved convergence rate. Further, we present modified nonlinear weights based on $L^1$-norm approach along with a new global smoothness indicator. The proposed nonlinear weights reduce numerical dissipation significantly, while attaining better resolution in smooth regions. Some experimental results for various benchmark test problems are presented to demonstrate the ability of the new scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".