Displacement Estimation in Ultrasound Elastography Using Pyramidal Convolutional Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, two novel deep learning methods are proposed for displacement estimation in ultrasound elastography (USE). Although convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been very successful for displacement estimation in computer vision, they have been rarely used for USE. One of the main limitations is that the radio frequency (RF) ultrasound data, which is crucial for precise displacement estimation, has vastly different frequency characteristics compared with images in computer vision. Top-rank CNN methods used in computer vision applications are mostly based on a multilevel strategy, which estimates finer resolution based on coarser ones. This strategy does not work well for RF data due to its large high-frequency content. To mitigate the problem, we propose modified pyramid warping and cost volume network (MPWC-Net) and RFMPWC-Net, both based on PWC-Net, to exploit information in RF data by employing two different strategies. We obtained promising results using networks trained only on computer vision images. In the next step, we constructed a large ultrasound simulation database and proposed a new loss function to fine-tune the network to improve its performance. The proposed networks and well-known optical flow networks as well as state-of-the-art elastography methods are evaluated using simulation, phantom, and in vivo data. Our two proposed networks substantially outperform current deep learning methods in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and strain ratio (SR). Also, the proposed methods perform similar to the state-of-the-art elastography methods in terms of CNR and have better SR by substantially reducing the underestimation bias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".