MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006679257 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2976749

An Intermittent Frequency Synthesizer With Accurate Frequency Detection for Fast Duty-Cycled Receivers

2020· article· en· W3006679257 on OpenAlexafffund
Yadong Yin, Kamal El‐Sankary, Zhizhang Chen, Yueming Gao, Mang I Vai, Sio Hang Pun

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFrequency synthesizerDuty cycleComputer scienceFrequency standardElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPhase-locked loopJitterTelecommunicationsVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An intermittent frequency synthesizer for fast duty-cycled receivers is presented in this paper. Different from state-of-art techniques which try to eliminate the initial phase error that degrades the intermittent frequency detection, a new frequency detector is proposed to maintain an accurate frequency detection regardless of the initial phase error. Moreover, an averaged fraction division scheme (AFDS) is integrated in the synthesizer to improve the frequency resolution. The frequency synthesizer is implemented and verified by using discrete devices and an FPGA. The measurement results show that the frequency detector provides a frequency detection accuracy of 0.88%, and the synthesizer achieves a frequency resolution of 0.625 MHz when controlled by a duty-cycled signal with a 6-$\mu \text{s}$period and a 2-$\mu \text{s}$time duration. The frequency synthesizer can perform an intermittent frequency hopping from 160MHz to 140MHz while requiring a period of$430~\mu \text{s}$without disturbing the VCO’s oscillation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207