MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006707339 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa365

SN 2016gsd: an unusually luminous and linear Type II supernova with high velocities

2020· article· en· W3006707339 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. Reynolds, M. Fraser, S. Mattila, M. Ergon, Luc Dessart, Peter Lundqvist, Subo Dong, N. Elias–Rosa, L. Galbany, C. P. Gutiérrez, T. Kangas, E. Kankare, R. Kotak, H. Kuncarayakti, A. Pastorello, Ósmar Rodríguez, S. J. Smartt, M. Stritzinger, L. Tomasella, Ping Chen, J. Harmanen, G. Hosseinzadeh, D. A. Howell, C. Inserra, M. Nicholl, M. B. Nielsen, K. Smith, A. Somero, R. Tronsgaard, D. R. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research CouncilHorizon 2020Fakulta Lesnická a Drevarská, Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v PrazeJenny ja Antti Wihurin RahastoScience and Technology Facilities CouncilScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemConsejo Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y TecnologíaQueen's UniversitySuomen KulttuurirahastoChinese Academy of SciencesMinisterio de Economía, Fomento y Turismo, ChileSmithsonian InstitutionVetenskapsrådetNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSpace Telescope Science InstituteEuropean Southern ObservatoryComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity College DublinNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandNational Central UniversityVillum FondenEuropean CommissionLos Alamos National LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityBrinson FoundationMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieNational Sleep FoundationDurham UniversityNuclear Safety and Security CommissionGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastDanmarks Frie Forskningsfond
KeywordsPhysicsSupernovaAstrophysicsEjectaLight curveMetallicityGalaxyWhite dwarfPair-instability supernovaSpectral lineLuminosityAbsolute magnitudeAstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present observations of the unusually luminous Type II supernova (SN) 2016gsd. With a peak absolute magnitude of V = −19.95 ± 0.08, this object is one of the brightest Type II SNe, and lies in the gap of magnitudes between the majority of Type II SNe and the superluminous SNe. Its light curve shows little evidence of the expected drop from the optically thick phase to the radioactively powered tail. The velocities derived from the absorption in H α are also unusually high with the blue edge tracing the fastest moving gas initially at 20 000 km s−1, and then declining approximately linearly to 15 000 km s−1 over ∼100 d. The dwarf host galaxy of the SN indicates a low-metallicity progenitor which may also contribute to the weakness of the metal lines in its spectra. We examine SN 2016gsd with reference to similarly luminous, linear Type II SNe such as SNe 1979C and 1998S, and discuss the interpretation of its observational characteristics. We compare the observations with a model produced by the jekyll code and find that a massive star with a depleted and inflated hydrogen envelope struggles to reproduce the high luminosity and extreme linearity of SN 2016gsd. Instead, we suggest that the influence of interaction between the SN ejecta and circumstellar material can explain the majority of the observed properties of the SN. The high velocities and strong H α absorption present throughout the evolution of the SN may imply a circumstellar medium configured in an asymmetric geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207