A251 VERY EARLY ONSET INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN CHILDREN: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE OVER 15 YEARS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEOIBD) refers to an IBD diagnosis established before the 6th year of life, including a subset of patients with disease onset before the age of 2 years, known as infantile-onset IBD (IO-IBD) (1). VEO-IBD accounts for 15% of pediatric IBD and infantile IBD in approximately 1% (2,3). VEOIBD is considered to be a unique entity, and compared to adults with IBD, VEO-IBD children are more likely to present with extensive and treatment-resistant disease (4). Aims To analyze the clinical characteristics and management of patients diagnosed with very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD). Methods A retrospective analysis of children diagnosed with VEO-IBD (age <6 years) at the Montreal Children’s Hospital from 2003–2018 was performed. Clinical data for VEO-IBD patients was collected to identify the clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and histological features of these patients and their clinical course until 2018. Results A total of 28 VEO-IBD patients (71% male) were included in this study. The median age of disease onset was 52 months. A diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD) or CD-like intestinal manifestations accounted for 89% of the VEO-IBD cases. Most patients had Crohn’s colitis (36%) of whom 50% had evidence of granulomatous Crohn’s disease; 11 patients[NAD1] [AQAB2] (39%) had upper gastrointestinal involvement. Over their progress of the disease, 4 patients (14%) required surgical intervention, while 11 patients (39%) required biologic therapy for maintenance therapy. Genetic[NAD3] [AQAB4] results were available for 5 patients out of 28 (18%) and 3 of them were identified to have monogenic IBD. Conclusions In our center, the majority of patients with VEO-IBD had typical Crohn’s disease presentation. Most of the VEO-IBD patients responded well to the standard IBD treatment. Genetic studies were not done regularly for all of our patients, however, among those who had this testing performed 3/5 had an identifiable cause, suggesting that these patients should be investigated for an underlying genetic abnormality. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".