Accurate localization of linear probe electrodes across multiple brains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently developed silicon probes have large numbers of recording electrodes on long linear shanks. Specifically, Neuropixels probes have 960 recording electrodes distributed over 9.6 mm shanks. Because of their length, Neuropixels probe recordings in rodents naturally span multiple brain areas. Typical studies collate recordings across several recording sessions and animals. Neurons recorded in different sessions and animals have to be aligned to each other and to a standardized brain coordinate system. Here we report a workflow for accurate localization of individual electrodes in standardized coordinates and aligned across individual brains. This workflow relies on imaging brains with fluorescent probe tracks and warping 3-dimensional image stacks to standardized brain atlases. Electrophysiological features are then used to anchor particular electrodes along the reconstructed tracks to specific locations in the brain atlas and therefore to specific brain structures. We performed ground-truth experiments, in which motor cortex outputs are labelled with ChR2 and a fluorescence protein. Recording from brain regions targeted by these outputs reveals better than 100 μm accuracy for electrode localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".