MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006805866 · doi:10.2298/tsci191102084m

Modeling and simulation of wind turbine heat recycling system

2020· article· en· W3006805866 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWind powerThermal energy storageEnvironmental scienceRenewable energyTurbineEnergy storageNuclear engineeringMolten saltProcess engineeringPower (physics)Mechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper aims to discuss the power supply and heat supply system of wind turbine, promote the development of wind energy in heat recycling, and expand the application of renewable energy resources in replacing fossil energy. Starting from the construction of wind power heat storage system model, first, molten salt was selected as the fluid heat storage material. Based on the realization process of two-pot molten salt electrothermal transformation, the model of two-pot molten salt heat storage (MSHS) system was established. Second, based on the model of heat storage system, the high temperature MSHS wind power heating system was simulated by using the numerical simulation analysis method. The results showed that the simulation results of the thermal storage system model were highly consistent with the actual results, and the model was accurate and reliable, which was suitable for the simulation analysis of the thermal storage system. After a day of operation, the utilization rate of wind energy of the MSHS wind power heating system could reach more than 94%. The combination of the MSHS wind power system and regional heating had obvious effect on absorbing wind power, saving resources, and solving the problems of wind curtailment. In the MSHS wind power supply heating system, the configuration of MSHS significantly improved the utilization ratio of wind energy in the wind power generation system, even up to 100% at maximum. To sum up, the configuration of MSHS can absorb most of the wind energy generated on that day, thus improving the energy utilization ratio of the wind power generation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it