EFEKTIVITAS PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PEMUDA INDONESIA-KANADA DALAM MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS KEPEMUDAAN DI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the effectiveness of Indonesia-Canada Youth Exchange Program in Kalimantan Timur in order to increase youth activity, primary data were obtained through key informant namely Committee from Dinas Pemuda dan Olahraga Kalimantan Timur, and 4 informants consisting of PCMI Kalimantan Timur, also alumnae of Indonesia-Canada Youth Exchange Program from Kalimantan Timur Province, also supported by secondary data which is relevant archive. Furthermore, it was analyzed using Analysis Qualitative Data with CIPP Model through the scheme of FAO/Soekartawi evaluation research activities. The result of the research shows that the Indonesia-Canada Youth Exchange Program in Kalimantan Timur is not effective to increase youth activity because in implementation is founded that some components of program success factor were not implemented.Keywords: Effective, Youth Exchange, CIPP
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".