“Men of the North”: Archibald Lampman's Use of Incidents in the Lives of Medieval Monarchs and Aristocrats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
‘‘THE MOST interesting among the […] Northern races were the Scandinavians or Norsemen […] Their Vikings and Sea kings, sallying forth in their frail vessels, made the North once more the terror of the world,” wrote R.G. Haliburton in 1869 in The Men of the North and Their Place in History ; “[h]ere in the New World, we, who are sprung from these men of the North, are about to form a New Dominion in this Northern land, a worthy home for the old Frost Giant […] We are the Northmen of the New World ” […] I am sick of hearing our poets forever harping upon the sunny South as ‘the land of love and song.’” Archibald Lampman (1861–1899) was living in Ontario in March 1869 when Haliburton delivered his lecture to the Montreal Literary Club, and there is no evidence that he read or knew of the influential lecture, but he certainly knew of the widespread belief that it articulated and helped to disseminate in the wake of Confederation (1867) – namely the belief that, as citizens of a northern nation, Canadians were environmentally and temperamentally aligned with the peoples of northern Europe and Britain, both modern and medieval. To a considerable extent, Canada's supposed northern identity, most visibly manifested in the ancient fortifications of Quebec City and the neo-Gothic architecture of the newly built Houses of Parliament in Ottawa, was one of its ways of differentiating the Dominion from the United States, which was proclaiming itself the new Rome through the neoclassical architecture of Washington, DC and several state capitals. As a student at Trinity College, Toronto from 1879 to 1882, Lampman enthusiastically embraced the Hanoverian component of his ancestry; among the works that he wrote after leaving college and settling in Ottawa are two fairy tales – “Hans Fingerhut's Frog Lesson” and “The Fairy Fountain” – set respectively in Germany and Scandinavia; and one of his projects, he told a college friend in 1884, was a strictly Canadian poem, local in incident and spirit, but cosmopolitan in form and manner […] in the metre of [Longfellow’s] Evangeline but more like [Goethe’s] Hermann and Dorothea, or, nearer still, to the translations from a Swedish poet, [Johan Ludwig] Runeberg, who wrote lovely things about the peasants of Finland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.036 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".