A Review of the Applications of Dual-Energy CT in Acute Neuroimaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (CT) is a promising tool with increasing availability and multiple emerging and established clinical applications in neuroradiology. With its ability to allow characterization of materials based on their differential attenuation when imaged at two different energy levels, dual-energy CT can help identify the composition of brain, neck, and spinal components. Virtual monoenergetic imaging allows a range of simulated single energy-level reconstructions to be created with postprocessing. Low-energy reconstructions can aid identification of edema, ischemia, and subtle lesions due to increased soft tissue contrast as well as increasing contrast-to-noise ratios on angiographic imaging. Higher energy reconstructions can reduce image artifact from dental amalgam, aneurysm clips and coils, spinal hardware, dense contrast, and dense bones. Differentiating iodine from hemorrhage may help guide management of patients after thrombectomy and aid diagnosis of enhancing tumors within parenchymal hemorrhages. Iodine quantification may predict hematoma expansion in aneurysmal bleeds and outcomes in traumatic brain injury. Calcium and bone subtraction can be used to distinguish hemorrhage from brain parenchymal mineralization as well as improving visualization of extra-axial lesions and vessels adjacent to dense plaque or skull. This article reviews the basics of dual-energy CT and highlights many of its clinical applications in the evaluation of acute neurological presentations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".