A Biomimetric Lactate Imprinted Smart Polymers as Capacitive Sweat Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper demonstrates a non-enzymatic biomimetric flexible sweat sensor. Fabricated by multi-layered assembly, the layers comprised a conductive nanoporous carbon nanotube-cellulose nanocrystals (CNC/CNT) porous films entrained with poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM) based microgel. The pNIPAM microgels based sensor films are effective for detection of ionic strength. The pNIPAM microgels coated with lactate imprinted poly (aniline/phenylboronic acid) (pANI/PBA) moieties switch off their responsivity to NaCl and instead effectively respond to lactate. As such, the printed pNIPAM microgels have been demonstrated as flexible capacitive sensor for multiplex detection of electrolyte (e.g. NaCl) and lactate levels in sweat analysis. The linear concentration range obtained for pNIPAM @CNC/CNT sensor in response to NaCl was 3-80 mM, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.23 mM NaCl. The lactate imprinted pANI/PBA- pNIPAM @CNC/CNT sensor resulted in a linear range of 1 mM-25 mM, and a LOD of 0.10 mM, an order of magnitude higher than the non-imprinted form. For both analytes, the sensor precision ranged from 0.5-5.0%, indicative of the overall reliability and validity. The fabricated flexible sensors were demonstrated to be effective in quantitation of electrolytes (principally NaCl) and lactate in a real sweat sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".