MAPDP: A Cloud-Based Computational Platform for Immunopeptidomics Analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The immunopeptidome corresponds to the repertoire of peptides presented at the cell surface by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Cytotoxic T cells scan this repertoire to identify nonself antigens that can arise from tumors or infected cells. The identification of actionable antigenic targets is key to the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines, T-cell therapy, and other T-cell receptor-based biologics. The growing clinical interest for immunopeptidomics has accelerated the development of high throughput proteogenomic platforms that provide a system-level analysis of MHC-associated peptides. Improvement in sensitivity and throughput of mass spectrometers now allows the detection of a few thousands of peptides from less than 100 million cells. To manage the amount of data generated by these instruments, we have developed the MHC-associated peptide discovery platform (MAPDP), a novel open-source cloud-based computational platform for immunopeptidomic analyses. It provides convenient access from a web portal to immunopeptidomes stored in the database, filtering tools, various visualizations, annotations (e.g., IEDB, dbSNP, gnomAD), peptide-binding affinity prediction (mhcflurry, NetMHC), HLA genotyping, and the generation of personalized proteome databases. MAPDP functionalities are demonstrated here by the discovery of MHC peptides featuring new genetic variants identified in two previously published ovarian carcinoma data sets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".