MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006968401 · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.023

Corrigendum to “Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data” [Gynecol. Oncol. 154 (2019) 441–448]

2020· review· en· W3006968401 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul A. Cohen, Aime Powell, Steffen Böhm, C. Blake Gilks, Colin J.R. Stewart, Tarek Meniawy, Max Bulsara, Stefanie Avril, Eleanor C. Brockbank, Tjalling Bosse, Gustavo Rubino de Azevedo Focchi, Raji Ganesan, Rosalind Glasspool, Brooke E. Howitt, Hyun Soo Kim, Jung‐Yun Lee, Nhu D. Le, Michelle Lockley, Ranjit Manchanda, Trupti Mandalia, W. Glenn McCluggage, Iain A. McNeish, Divya Midha, Radhika Srinivasan, Yun Yi Tan, Rachael van der Griend, Mayu Yunokawa, Gian Franco Zannoni, Naveena Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic Oncology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlVancouver General Hospital
FundersBarts Charity
KeywordsMedicineKingdomFamily medicineLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Authors acknowledge the original list of individuals in The HGSC CRS Collaborative Network outlined in Appendix A. Supplementary Data was incomplete. The complete list is outlined below, with the previously omitted names bolded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.114
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.114
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.007
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2180.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecologic OncologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207