Optimal Multistage Charging of NCA/Graphite Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Electrothermal-Aging Dynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries have been extensively used in electric vehicles, portable electronics, cell phones, and laptops. The charging protocol, as one of the most critical technologies for Li-ion battery systems, has a significant impact on battery performance. Charging current affects battery degradation and charging time, and therefore, it needs to be carefully optimized. To this end, a novel charging protocol using a series of constant charging currents has been developed, which considers the charging time and the battery capacity fade simultaneously. These two conflicting charging objectives are traded off by solving a multiobjective optimization problem based on battery electrothermal-aging behavior. Particle swarm optimization has been applied to obtain the optimal charging current profile. Three optimal charging strategies for minimum charging time, minimum battery aging, and balanced charging performance are obtained by changing the weight factor. The proposed balanced charging is capable of reducing the charging time significantly with a negligible increase in capacity degradation compared with the 0.5 C constant-current constant-voltage (CC-CV) strategy recommended by the manufacturer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it