MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007000927 · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2020.100844

Validation of a stability-indicating HPLC-UV method for the quantification of acetazolamide in Oral-Mix and Oral-Mix SF

2020· article· en· W3007000927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMethodsX · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetazolamideChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChemistrySuspension (topology)Oral administrationPharmacologyMedicineMathematicsAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript details the modifications made to the HPLC assay method described in the USP monograph for Acetazolamide Compounded Oral Suspension.•The method was modified to allow the quantification of acetazolamide in two new suspension vehicles: Oral Mix and Oral Mix SF;•It was validated for linearity, accuracy, precision and specificity;•It was demonstrated stability-indicating and suitable for use in a stability study using these vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.219
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it