MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007002179 · doi:10.1306/eg.06201919005

The effect of site characterization data on injection capacity and cap rock integrity modeling during carbon dioxide storage in the Nisku saline aquifer at the Wabamun Lake area, Canada

2020· article· en· W3007002179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Geosciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of SaskatchewanAlberta EnergyCarbon Management Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferCarbon dioxideGeologyCarbon sequestrationHydrology (agriculture)GeochemistryGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphologyPetroleum engineeringPetrologyGroundwaterChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Geological storage of CO2 is an option for mitigating global climate change resulting from greenhouse gas emissions. Effective selection, design, and operation of storage sites require reliable models for predicting the response to CO2 injection. This paper revisits preliminary studies of CO2 storage in the Nisku saline aquifer in Alberta, Canada, which were conducted to assess CO2 injectivity, plume migration, and geomechanical response during 50 yr of injection, using model input parameters estimated from data available at the time. The new work presented here involved modeling of CO2 injection using the same tools but with input parameters obtained from data acquired in an evaluation well. The first series of new simulations modeled fluid flow using a commercial black-oil simulator and predicted a lower maximum injection rate (0.80 million t [Mt]/yr [0.88 million tons (Mtons)/yr] compared to 1.0 Mt/yr [1.1 Mtons/yr]) but a CO2 plume width nearly identical with the preliminary prediction (as a consequence of increases in some parameters that offset decreases in other parameters). The second series of new simulations was undertaken using a coupled thermo–hydro–mechanical simulator and predicted ground surface uplift approximately four times less than the preliminary study and (when injecting above the fracture pressure) fracture dimensions several times greater. As before, thermal effects resulting from cool CO2 injection were observed to promote lateral fracture growth in the aquifer and reduce (but not prevent) vertical growth into the cap rock. Use of the evaluation well data in this study enabled a more confident conclusion that injection above the fracturing pressure is not feasible for this site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it