Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce a pseudo Cauchy Riemann(PCR)-structure defined by a real tensor field $\bar{J}$ of type $(1, 1)$ of a real semi-Riemannian manifold $(\bar{M}, \bar{g})$ such that $\bar{J}^2 = \lambda^2 I$, where $\lambda$ is a function on $\bar{M}$. We prove that, contrary to the even dimensional CR-manifolds, a PCR-manifold is not necessarily of even dimension if $\lambda$ is every where non-zero real function on $\bar{M}$, supported by two odd dimensional examples and one physical model. The metric of PCR-manifold is not severely restricted. Then, we define a pseudo framed(PF)-manifold $(M, g)$ by a real tensor field $f$ such that $f^3 = \lambda^2 f$, where $T(M)$ splits into a direct sum of two subbundles, namely $im(f)$ (with a PCR-structure) and $ ker(f)$, supported by some mathematical and physical examples. Finally, we study a revised version of a contact manifold, called contact PF-manifold, which is a particular case of a PF-manifold where dim$(ker(f))=1$. Contrary to the odd dimensional contact manifolds, there do exist even dimensional contact PF-manifolds. We also propose several open problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".