MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007026443 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.127

A128 JACKHAMMER ESOPHAGUS – A META-ANALYSIS OF PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, DISEASE PRESENTATION, MANOMETRY DATA AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES

2020· article· en· W3007026443 on OpenAlexaff
George Wahba, Mickaël Bouin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDysphagiaHigh resolution manometryGERDInternal medicineHeartburnMeta-analysisEsophagusEsophageal motility disorderDemographicsRefluxGastroenterologyDiseaseSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a newly described esophageal motility disorder characterized by the presence of distal esophageal hypercontractility. However, there is limited data on JE and this entity remains misunderstood. Aims To systematically review the published clinical data on JE and present pooled data on patient demographics, disease presentation, manometry parameters and treatment outcomes from the available literature. Methods We performed a systematic review of clinical series on JE (based on the latest Chicago Classification criteria (v3.0)) through MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. Patient data from included studies were then extracted and random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate and compare pooled data. Results Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria reporting on at least one pooled variable. The pooled prevalence of JE was 1.97% [95% CI: 1.39%-2.78%] amongst patients referred for high resolution manometry (HRM) based on eleven studies reporting this data (Figure 1). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.8 years [95% CI: 57.1–64.4] and 65% [95% CI: 58%-72%] of patients were female. JE was significantly more prevalent in post-lung transplant patients and morbidly obese patients undergoing HRM (23.99% [95% CI: 9.00%-38.97%] and 5.18% [95% CI: 1.76%-14.3%] respectively). Dysphagia was the most common presentation of JE (64% [95% CI: 52%-77%]) followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (46% [95% CI: 26%-67%]), regurgitation (39% [95% CI: 10%-67%] and heartburn (34% [95% CI: 22%-45%]). The pooled mean distal contractile integer (DCI) of all ten standard HRM swallows was 9,535 mmHg●s●cm [95% CI: 6,978–12,093] and the pooled mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was 13.9 mmHg [95% CI: 8.2–19.7]. Endoscopic treatment as a whole was more successful than medical treatment in achieving clinical symptom improvement (79% [95% CI: 74%-85%] vs. 63% [95% CI: 47%-79%]; p=0.012). The pooled clinical success rate of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) specifically was 82% [95% CI: 75%-90%]. Conclusions JE is a new motility disorder most commonly presenting with dysphagia. High clinical suspicion is important because the diagnosis can only be made through HRM and treatment outcomes are generally satisfactory. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.056
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207