MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unsupervised Image Categorization Based on Variational Autoencoder and Student’s-T Mixture Model

2019· article· en· W3007069630 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Zhang, Wentao Fan, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderCluster analysisArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMixture modelPattern recognition (psychology)Generative modelUnsupervised learningConvolutional neural networkInferenceRepresentation (politics)Generative grammarArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a novel generative robust image catego-rization approach is developed based on variational autoencoder (VAE) and Student's-T Mixture Model (STMM). The network structure composed of VAE, STMM and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) generates data. More specifically, first, a cluster is chosen using the STMM. Then, a latent representation is extracted from the selected cluster through a CNN encoder. After that, an observation is generated based on another CNN through a decoding process. The proposed model is learned through variational inference where the Evidence Lower Bound is optimized according to Stochastic Gradient Descent(SGD) and the reparameterization trick. Based on our experimental results, the proposed generative clustering approach is able to outperform classical clustering approaches (e.g. K-means, Gaussian Mixture Models) and other related generative clustering approaches. Furthermore, we show that our generative model is able to generate highly realistic samples without using any supervised information during training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207