Diagnosticar la cultura en Risaralda (Colombia) sobre mercados verdes, para una transformación productiva en el Tratado de Libre Comercio: Colombia – Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduccion: propuesta investigativa para el diagnostico de la cultura existente en Risaralda, sobre aspectos relacionados con los mercados verdes y su pertinente contextualizacion, ademas de la promocion en la transformacion productiva, con el fin de aprovechar eficazmente el Tratado de Libre Comercio vigente entre Colombia y Canada. Metodos: para el desarrollo de la propuesta se han establecido tres categorias que permiten conceptualizar el avance de la misma: en primer lugar se analiza lo concerniente a mercados verdes y el biocomercio que actualmente desarrolla el Departamento; posteriormente se evalua la productividad al interior de las organizaciones con parametros especificos tales como la tecnologia, la filosofia empresarial y los recursos humanos; y en ultimo lugar se encuentra el Tratado de Libre Comercio, examinando las reglas para la correcta interaccion entre mercados, asi como el optimo aprovechamiento del mismo. Resultados: no se tienen aun, por ser una propuesta de investigacion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".