MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3007120055 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.051

A52 BUTYRATE SUPPLEMENTATION AMELIORATES DAMAGE CAUSED BY ENTERIC CITROBACTER RODENTIUM INFECTION

2020· article· en· W3007120055 on OpenAlexaff
Larissa Sbaglia Celiberto, Genelle R. Healey, Jimin Xu, Lijun Xia, Bruce A. Vallance

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitrobacter rodentiumMucusButyrateMicrobiologyInflammationBiologyMedicineImmunologyGastroenterologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often display a dysbiotic microbiome as well as a defective intestinal mucus layer, which appears thinner and more penetrable than the mucus layer of healthy subjects. Tributyrin (TB), a prodrug of butyric acid, has shown beneficial effects in models of IBD due to its anti-inflammatory effects. We previously showed that mice lacking the major intestinal mucin Muc2 (Muc2-/-) or lacking the “Core1” enzyme responsible for glycosylating Muc2 (C1galt1-/-) were highly susceptible to infection by Citrobacter rodentium, a murine model of intestinal inflammation. Aims The study explored the role of gut mucus in providing host defense against C. rodentium, as well as the effects of TB supplementation in the prevention of mucosal damage in this model. Methods Six to ten week old wildtype (WT), Muc2-/-, flox control (C1galt1f/f) and C1galt1-/- mice were infected with C. rodentium (∼2.5 × 108 CFU) by oral gavage. For TB supplementation experiments, mice received 100µL of TB or glycerol as a control by oral gavage every other day starting on day 1 post infection. Mice were monitored daily throughout the experiment and were euthanized at day 6 of infection. Several tissues of interest were collected to verify bacterial colonization in the gut and at systemic sites as well as histological tissue damage. Cecal contents were collected for the analysis of short chain fatty acids, while blood was collected by cardiac puncture after oral gavage with FITC-dextran to measure intestinal permeability. Results While WT and C1galt1f/f mice were only modestly susceptible to C. rodentium infection, Muc2-/- and C1galt1-/- mice displayed dramatically (100 fold) increased pathogen burdens, significantly greater intestinal macroscopic and histopathology scores, and heightened barrier disruption as compared to controls. Moreover, Muc2-/- and C1galt1-/- mice showed significantly lower levels of butyric acid as compared to control mice under baseline conditions. Interestingly, when supplemented with TB, Muc2-/- and C1galt1-/- proved less susceptible to C. rodentium infection, as indicated by reduced weight loss and clinical signs of colitis, while pathogen burdens were greatly reduced as was histological tissue damage, and epithelial barrier dysfunction. The same protection was conferred when TB was administered as a dietary supplementation, thus confirming its beneficial effect in protecting mice against C. rodentium infection. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that intestinal mucus controls host susceptibility to C. rodentium infection via control over butyrate levels, and highlight the need to explore the mechanisms by which gut mucus modulates the resident microbiota and its metabolites. Funding Agencies CCC, CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicProbiotics and Fermented Foods→French-language works237,207→