MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007192247 · doi:10.1002/eji.201948456

The immune checkpoint receptor associated phosphatases SHP‐1 and SHP‐2 are not required for γδT17 cell development, activation, or skin inflammation

2020· article· en· W3007192247 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Darshana Kadekar, Rasmus Agerholm, Mònica Torrellas Viñals, John Rizk, Vasileios Bekiaris

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLEO FondetLundbeckfondenH. Lundbeck A/SYork University
KeywordsBiologyInflammationCell biologyPhosphataseImmune systemImmunologyCancer researchPhosphorylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IL-17-producing gamma delta (γδT17) cells are innate lymphocytes critical for antibacterial protection at barrier surfaces such as the skin but also highly pathogenic during inflammation. It is therefore important to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that could counter-balance overt γδT17 cell activation. Immune checkpoint receptors (ICRs) deliver inhibitory signals to activated lymphocytes and have been implicated as negative regulators of mouse γδT17 cells. In this report, we investigated the cytokine signals that induce ICR expression on γδT17 cells and studied the in vivo role of the Src-homology-2 phosphatases 1 and 2 (SHP-1 and SHP-2) in the context of γδT17-induced psoriasis. We found that surface expression of ICRs can be induced by cytokines; however, SHP-1 or SHP-2 could not inhibit γδT17 responses. In this regard, conditional deletion of SHP-1, SHP-2, or both did no impact γδT17 cell development, expansion, cytokine production, or skin pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207