MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007218352 · doi:10.2298/fil1911587s

AB-wavelet frames in L2(Rn)

2019· article· en· W3007218352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFilomat · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Board for Higher Mathematics
KeywordsWaveletMathematicsContext (archaeology)Frame (networking)Frame workRealmPure mathematicsFourier transformMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceTheoretical physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to provide a unified treatment for the continuum and digital realm of multivariate data, Guo, Labate, Weiss and Wilson [Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (2004), 78-87] introduced the notion of AB-wavelets in the context of multiscale analysis. We continue and extend their work by studying the frame properties of AB-wavelet systems {DADBTk??(k ? Zn; 1 <? ? <? L)}in L2(Rn). More precisely, we establish four theorems giving su_cient conditions under which the AB-wavelet system constitutes a frame for L2(Rn). The proposed conditions are stated in terms of the Fourier transforms of the generating functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it