MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007282990 · doi:10.1353/chq.2020.0010

The Embodied Child: Readings in Children's Literature and Culture ed. by Roxanne Harde and Lydia Kokkola

2020· article· en· W3007282990 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tharini Viswanath

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren's Literature Association quarterly · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipCriticismEmbodied cognitionReading (process)SociologyHistoryLiteratureArtEpistemologyPhilosophyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Embodied Child: Readings in Children's Literature and Culture ed. by Roxanne Harde and Lydia Kokkola Tharini Viswanath (bio) The Embodied Child: Readings in Children's Literature and Culture. Edited by Roxanne Harde and Lydia Kokkola. Routledge, 2018. Roxanne Harde and Lydia Kokkola's edited collection comprises sixteen remarkable essays that examine representations of the child's body in literature and culture as well as the "embodiedness of the reading process" (3). The essays provide robust considerations of a range of (mostly North American and European) children's texts from the mid-nineteenth century to the present day by employing a myriad of theoretical lenses including literary criticism, education, cultural studies, philosophy, disability studies, gender studies, and religious studies. Kokkola acknowledges in her introduction that much children's literature scholarship separates the body from the mind, where the child is traditionally associated with the desiring body and the adult with the rational mind. The dual purpose of this text, therefore, is to challenge such readings by examining the identity [End Page 93] politics surrounding children's bodies, and to "consolidate the disparate streams of scholarship on children and their bodies" (15). The first essay in the collection, "Anne's Body Has a Mind (and Soul) of Its Own" by Janet Wesselius, gives readers an overview of the history of mind-body dualism and relates it to the child's body in L. M. Montgomery's Anne of Green Gables. The essays that follow are arranged in four broadly thematic sections, each with its own introduction. Section 1, Politicizations," deals with the politics surrounding the child's body and the functions of power in a myriad of social structures including race, gender, and class. Karen Sands-O'Connor's "Learning Not to Hate What We Are" engages with biographies of Marcus Garvey from the United States, the United Kingdom, and the West Indies during the Black Power movement (which politicized the bodies of African American children even as it helped them build self-esteem). Harde's analysis of Katniss Everdeen in Suzanne Collins's The Hunger Games trilogy as the Appalachian body is among the most compelling essays in the collection. She argues that Katniss's body synecdochally becomes the homeland she represents, as her body—and the surrounding ecosystem—are repeatedly destroyed and rejuvenated. The last two essays in this section highlight the internalization of (often unattainable) female beauty standards: Heather Braun demonstrates how ultra-thinness is equated to (often powerless) sexual desirability in Louise O'Neill's Only Ever Yours; Michelle Martin and Rachelle D. Washington's essay on representations of African American hair in contemporary picturebooks begins with autobiographical criticism to exemplify how black girls and women are under enormous pressure to conform to Caucasian beauty standards. Each of the essays in this section calls readers' attention to diverse cultural constructions of the child's body and the impact that they have on society. The second section, "Corporealities," analyzes how normalcy is constructed and enforced in texts that feature differently abled bodies. The three essays in this section focus on novels and ephemera published between 1872 and 1930 that endeavored to teach young readers "corporeal lessons about morality, citizenship, and wellness" (96): first, Julie Pfeiffer and Darla Schumm read Katy's disabled body in What Katy Did as punishment for breaking gender codes in "Disciplining Normalcy"; next, Kristine Moruzi examines the early years of the Junior Red Cross magazine (1922–30) to show how "Canadian children were guided towards behaviors and attitudes designed to promote a healthy and charitable life" (113); finally, Amanda Hollander engages in discussions of how "eugenics seeped into mainstream British and American children's literature" by analyzing the works of Fabian authors such as E. Nesbit and Jean Webster (127). Ultimately, all three essays individually demonstrate how literature published over six decades in three different countries guided the child reader toward being a good (read: socially and culturally acceptable) citizen. [End Page 94] Section 3, "Reading Bodies," acknowledges that the "reading body is intimately intertwined with the processes of meaning-formation, critical and emotional response, and the forging of memories" (142). Cleverly organized, each essay in this section augments readers' understanding...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren's Literature Association quarterlySame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207