A100 ORAL VANCOMYCIN THERAPY FOR CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION AND RISK OF INFECTION WITH GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Vancomycin is the recommended first-line therapy for mild to severe Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, oral vancomycin is associated with disruption of the indigenous microbiota, predisposing patients to overgrowth of endogenous pathogens such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Aims The primary objective of the study is to examine the effect of the treatment regimens of CDI on the risk of infection with gram-negative organisms in adult patients treated for CDI. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 319 adult patients treated for CDI at Hamilton Health Sciences in the year 2015. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if oral vancomycin-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of infection with gram-negative organisms after adjustment for other factors. Results Eighty-one patients were excluded because of recurrent episodes of CDI within the same year or missing information. 238 patients were included in the final analysis. 48 (20.2%) patients had positive culture for gram-negative organisms after onset of CDI. Urine was the most common source for gram-negative organisms (39/48, 81.3%) followed by blood (8/48,16.7%). The most common isolated gram-negative organisms were Escherichia coli (18/48, 37.5%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (9/48, 18.8%). The most common CDI treatment regimens were metronidazole monotherapy (137/238, 57.6%), vancomycin monotherapy (13/238, 5.5%), and combination therapy (88/238, 37.0%). Among patients who were treated with metronidazole monotherapy, vancomycin monotherapy, and combination therapy, 30(30/137, 21.9%), 3 (3/13,23.1%), and 15 (15/88, 17.1%) had positive culture for gram-negative organisms, respectively (P= 0.6). Ninety-seven (97/238,40.8%) patients had severe CDI, 40 (40/97, 41.2%) were treated with metronidazole monotherapy, 5(5/97, 5.2%) with vancomycin monotherapy, and 52 (52/97, 53.6%) with combination therapy. 26 (26/141,18.4%) and 22 (22/97, 22.7%) had positive culture for gram-negative organisms among patients with non-severe and severe CDI, receptively (P= 0.7). In the multivariate analysis, neither type of CDI treatment regimen (P=0.2, 95% CI 0.30–1.31) nor CDI severity (P=0.4, 95% CI 0.67–2.69) was associated an increased risk of infection with gram-negative organisms after CDI onset. Conclusions Contrary to the reported literature, we did not find that oral vancomycin-based CDI treatment was associated with increased risk of infection with gram-negative organisms. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".