MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007507048 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.176

A177 AN UNUSUAL CULPRIT OF AN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED IN A PAEDIATRIC PATIENT

2020· article· en· W3007507048 on OpenAlexaff
Karin Bortolin, Govind B. Chavhan, Iram Siddiqui, Simon C. Ling

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVomitingAbdominal painInternal medicineGastroenterologyEsophagogastroduodenoscopyExploratory laparotomyUpper gastrointestinal bleedingPopulationSurgeryEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Leiomyomas are benign tumors originating from mesenchymal cells in the muscularis propria that present equally among the sexes usually as localized lesions after the fifth decade. Though rare, esophageal leiomyomas (EL) make up the majority of benign esophageal tumors and are typically located distally. Of all known cases, 2.6% are paediatric. In this population they are 1.71 times more common in females and are often diffuse. Most are slow growing and asymptomatic but when >5cm patients describe dysphagia, vomiting, pain, cough and anorexia. Gastric leiomyomas causing upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in adults are reported. Aims To discuss a rare cause of UGIB in a child. Methods Case report. Results We present a 16-year-old Asian boy with no significant past medical history who was transferred to our institution for an UGIB following 3 days of dark black stools, 1 day of coffee ground emesis and pre-syncope. There was no history of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use. At presentation he was in shock and received fluid resuscitation and a pantoprazole infusion. His hemoglobin dropped to 81 from 150g/L and corrected with 2 units of packed red blood cells. He was pale, non-dysmorphic with no cutaneous lesions, abdomen was non-distended and non-tender with no masses or hepatosplenomegaly. An abdominal ultrasound showed mild bowel wall thickening in the cecum and terminal ileum. Emergent upper endoscopy identified an ulcerated sessile mass at the gastro-esophageal junction. Biopsies revealed polypoid inflamed gastric mucosa with a focal intestinal metaplasia, negative for malignancy. Magnetic resonance scan characterized a 3.8x4.3x2.5cm lesion in the stomach cardia not extending beyond the serosa with suggested causes including EL and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) demonstrated a 2.8x1.8cm well circumscribed homogenous hypoechoic mass in the muscularis propria of the distal esophagus. Histopathology showed bland tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclei that did not demonstrate atypia. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) stains were positive for smooth muscle actin and desmin. CD117, S-100 and DOG1 were negative. Findings were therefore in keeping with a leiomyoma and not a GIST. He was referred to the Cancer Genetics clinic for consideration of hereditary leiomyomatosis renal cell cancer and General Surgery for resection. Conclusions This case highlights a rare cause of UGIB in a child. EL are scarcely found in children and at present there are no reports of EL causing UGIB. They can be associated with Alport Syndrome or Familial Leiomyomatosis. IHC is an essential diagnostic tool, enabling differentiation of EL from GIST which is important as the latter has malignant potential. EL can be monitored with endoscopy if small but are surgically resected if symptomatic, ulcerated, or growing. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207