MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007544287 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.071

A72 VARICEAL BLEED & PORTAL HYPERTENSIVE GASTROPATHY IN A NON-CIRRHOTIC PATIENT WITH ISOLATED SPLENOMEGALY

2020· article· en· W3007544287 on OpenAlexaff
S. M. Mahmudul Hasan, Meghan Dmitriew, Jennifer Leonard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePortal hypertensionEsophageal varicesGastroenterologyInternal medicineCirrhosisPortal venous pressureAscitesLiver biopsyGastric varicesVaricesPortal hypertensive gastropathyChronic liver diseaseEsophagogastroduodenoscopyBiopsyEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis is the most common etiology of esophageal varices. However, abnormalities of the spleno-portal axis in the absence of liver disease may also cause portal hypertension resulting in varices. We report a rare case of esophageal variceal bleed in a non-cirrhotic patient with isolated splenomegaly secondary to chronic G-CSF therapy. Aims This report outlines the case of a patient with Cohen Syndrome (CS) who presented with an upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed in the setting of previously documented splenomegaly and portal hypertension. We expand on the clinical investigations, diagnosis, treatment plan and hospital course of this patient. Methods Case report, review of literature. Results A 26-year old male with previously diagnosed CS presented with large volume hematemesis and pancytopenia. CS is a rare autosomal recessive disorder. In our patient this manifested with congenital neutropenia, microcephaly, retinal dystrophy and global developmental delay. He required long term G-CSF therapy to manage chronic neutropenia and subsequently developed splenomegaly, a known side effect. The most recent MRI identified stable splenomegaly with a craniocaudal length of 23 cm, normal liver size and no radiographic evidence of cirrhosis. The imaging was also significant for gastroesophageal and splenorenal varices but no ascites or recanalization of the umbilical vein. A recent liver biopsy had shown mild pericellular fibrosis with no active liver disease or cirrhosis. In the past, the patient had declined EGD, therapeutic splenectomy or assessment of hepatic venous pressure gradient through invasive venography. His liver enzymes, bilirubin and albumin had always been within normal limits. The patient had no history of GI bleeding. Previous investigations for hematologic malignancies or myelodysplastic syndrome had been negative. Upon admission, an urgent EGD revealed active variceal bleeding in the esophagus and portal gastropathy. Given the extent of his congenital orofacial abnormalities a variceal band ligator could not be passed for appropriate intervention. The patient was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit and managed with intravenous proton pump inhibitor, octreotide, as well as transfusions of packed red blood cells, platelets and fresh frozen plasma. Within the next 48 hours, the patient underwent successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and CT-guided coil placements for the bleeding varices. Conclusions This is a rare case of variceal bleed in a non-cirrhotic patient with portal hypertension from iatrogenic splenomegaly. While there are previous reports of spontaneous splenic rupture secondary to G-CSF therapy we are the first to report variceal bleed as a complication. This is a life-threatening consequence that requires urgent intervention and intensive care. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207