MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007589983

Feminine Voice in Manju Kapur’s “The Immigrant

2018· article· en· W3007589983 on OpenAlex
Shri Kishan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismImmigrationCharacter (mathematics)Face (sociological concept)Identity (music)Media studiesSociologyGender studiesHistoryPolitical scienceArtLawMathematicsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starting in 1960s in the United States, feminism as a movement has gathered a lot of momentum. In the post colonial India, the female writers have raised feministic voice through their female characters. Manju Kapur, in her novel “The Immigrant” has tried to raise the feminist voice through Nina and other female characters. Nina, who is a lecturer at Miranda House in Delhi, marries an NRI and settles in Canada. She has to face a lot of problems to settle there as she finds herself caught up in a kind of an inescapable web. By deciding to leave her husband who is totally indifferent to her, Nina tries to reinvent herself and make her own identity. Another character in the novel Zenobia, who is Nina’s friend, stands for total liberty of the women

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it