MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

VidAnomaly: LSTM-Autoencoder-Based Adversarial Learning for One-Class Video Classification With Multiple Dynamic Images

2019· article· en· W3007613960 on OpenAlexaff
Shusheng Li, Wenbo He

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Feature learningDeep learningEncoderRepresentation (politics)Computer visionMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-class video classification (anomalous video detection) serves an important role when abnormal videos are absent during training, poorly sampled or not well defined. However, one-class video classification is challenging. Due to the unavailability of abnormal samples, it is a cumbersome task to train an end-to-end deep supervised learning model. Meanwhile, video data representation is challenging because of the unstructured scheme of video contents. To represent video data with temporal and spatial information, we propose multiple dynamic images in our task because dynamic image encodes the temporal evolution of video frames and represents video contents at the level of the image pixels. Multiple dynamic images are viewed as the input sequence with temporal and spatial information and achieve dimension reduction of original video data. In this paper, we propose a LSTM-autoencoder-based adversarial learning model for one-class video classification ("VidAnomaly") without abnormal samples in the training stage. Our architecture is composed of three sub-networks. LSTM-autoencoder network (R) learns the temporal dependence of the input sequence and reconstructs the input sequence for the discriminator network (D) to achieve adversarial learning. The novelty of the proposed model is that we add an additional LSTM-encoder network (A) to obtain the latent representation of the reconstructed sequence. Minimizing the distance between the two latent representations from R and A benefits the model to further capture the training data distribution because it forces the LSTM-autoencoder network to yield an essential representation of training samples in latent space. In the inference stage, for a given abnormal sample as the input, the model poorly reconstructs the input abnormal sample and the reconstruction error would be high because the proposed model is trained merely on normal samples and its parameters are only suitable for reconstructing normal samples. Based on this, we detect abnormal samples. The experimental results show that VidAnomaly learns the target class distribution effectively and is superior to other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207