MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007667262

Paleoindian Technology in Beringia— A Technological and Morphological Analysis of the Northern Fluted-Point Complex

2015· article· en· W3007667262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeringiaPoint (geometry)GeologyArchaeologyGeographyMathematicsPleistocene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project is the first comprehensive analysis of fluted projectile points found across arctic North America and encompasses three levels of analysis that increase in scope geographically, methodologically, and theoretically. The start of the project served to develop an understanding of the technological organization represented at the first archaeological site to provide a clear radiocarbon record for fluted points in Alaska, Serpentine Hot Springs. The fluted-point collection from Serpentine was then used as a benchmark to compare the greater collection of fluted-points found across northern Alaska and Yukon and understand whether they represent a cohesive complex, and the technological risk and adaptive role associated with fluted-point use in the late Pleistocene Arctic. Finally, an expanded technological and morphological analysis comparing northern fluted points to other fluted-point forms found throughout North America was conducted to investigate whether convergence or cultural transmission was responsible for the presence of fluted-point technology in the far north. The first phase of the project consisted of an assemblage level analysis of the lithic collection recovered from the Serpentine Fluted-point Site. The site contained buried fluted projectile-point fragments, an associated lithic assemblage, and charcoal-rich cultural features AMS-radiocarbon dated to approximately 12,000 calendar years before present, placing it within a Paleoindian timeframe. Interpretation of the technological organization used by the site’s occupants provides a glimpse of a logistical system of mobility practiced by Paleoindian groups in the Arctic.\n\nThe second phase of the project consisted of a technological and morphological analysis of 51 northern fluted points that included metric, non-metric, and qualitative variables, which were statistically evaluated and compared to a collection of 46 Folsom artifacts. A new approach to geometric morphometrics was developed to evaluate variability in point outline shape, which allowed the analysis to focus solely on fluted-point basal morphology. Results confirm that northern fluted points represent a cohesive technological strategy and may have served as a risk-management system promoting ease-of-replacement-after-failure to offset transport costs and reduce risk during long-distance travel.\n\nThe final phase of the project featured a geometric morphometric shape analysis of 200 fluted points and point fragments, representing the Northern Fluted Complex and fluted points from further south in Canada, the Great Plains, and northeastern United States, to investigate the origin of northern fluted points. Results identified geographic patterns in basal projectile-point morphology and technology suggesting that fluting technology was not independently invented in the north, but originated proximately from the Ice-Free Corridor and ultimately from Clovis. Northern fluted-point technology was culturally transmitted from the south and variability introduced during this process resulted in a distinct arctic variant of Paleoindian fluted-point technology: the Northern Fluted Complex.\n\nThis new form of fluted projectile point is unique to the Arctic, yet evident of cultural continuity and a Paleoindian adaptation that spread throughout North America at the end of the last ice age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)Same topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207