MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007668297 · doi:10.1002/047167849x.bio105

Dietary Lipids and Physiological Function

2020· other· en· W3007668297 on OpenAlexaff
David D. Kitts

Bibliographic record

VenueBailey's Industrial Oil and Fat Products · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityMedicineDiabetes mellitusPolyunsaturated fatty acidLipid metabolismDiseaseEnvironmental healthStroke (engine)Cause of deathPhysiologyEndocrinologyBiologyInternal medicineFatty acidBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The association between dietary fat intake and chronic disease has been researched for more than 60 years. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be a leading cause of global mortality, accounting for 17.3 million deaths in 2013, equivalent to 31.5% of total deaths. One out of every three deaths in the United States is attributed to heart disease, stroke, or other forms of CVD; an estimated average of one death every second and more than 330 billion dollars in health expenditures and lost productivity. Moreover, the incidence of obesity has doubled from 1980 to 2015 in more than 40 countries and is associated with chronic diseases such as cardiovascular (atherosclerosis) and type 2 diabetes. Selecting diets that provide energy from monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats are also beneficial to consumer health. Fats and oils are the source of many nonesterified fatty acids that act as signaling molecules to regulate gene expression that controls body homeostasis, including lipid metabolism. This article describes how dietary fats and oils, and related derived products are involved in chemical and biochemical mechanisms that define the safety and toxicity of dietary lipid consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBailey's Industrial Oil and Fat ProductsSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207