MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007741607 · doi:10.4000/e-spania.33455

“Hermanos del cielo”. Figuras de vuelo en la poesía y la pintura sevillana de Fernando de Herrera a Juan de Arguijo (con Francisco Pacheco de por medio)

2020· article· es· W3007741607 on OpenAlexaff
Guy Lazure

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Spania · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A través de la obra de Fernando de Herrera y de Juan de Arguijo y del trabajo del pintor Francisco Pacheco en la famosa Casa de Pilatos de los Duques de Alcalá, este artículo estudia la presencia y el papel de figuras mitológicas como Ícaro, Faetón y Ganimedes en la poesía y la pintura sevillana del Siglo de Oro. Más allá de una lectura puramente moralizadora de la temática de la osadía, este ensayo interpreta la metáfora del vuelo como una expresión de las ambiciones literarias de los hombres de letras en la Sevilla de los siglos XVI y XVII.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-SpaniaSame topicHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesFrench-language works237,207