MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007808042 · doi:10.4000/ere.4551

Éducation muséale en ligne et engagement : La participation des musées à l’éducation à l’environnement

2019· article· fr· W3007808042 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Cédric Boudjema

Bibliographic record

VenueÉducation relative à l environnement · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur une analyse de sites Web de musées en lien avec l’éducation relative à l’environnement et montre les dispositifs pédagogiques sous-jacents. Il met en avant l’implication pédagogique en matière d’éducation muséale en ligne en s’appuyant sur des méthodologies mobilisées en muséologie de l’environnement notamment pour l’analyse des objectifs d’expositions itinérantes environnementales. Il entend ainsi démontrer que le faire valoir constitue une forme potentielle de l’ERE en ligne ce qui n’est pas sans engendrer des questionnements sur le mode de fonctionnement des musées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉducation relative à l environnementSame topicMuseums and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207