MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007831446 · doi:10.30878/ces.v27n1a5

Evaluación de receptores GPS de bajo costo de alta sensibilidad para trabajos geodésicos. Caso de estudio: línea base geodésica

2020· article· es· W3007831446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCIENCIA ergo sum · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnergy
TopicEnvironmental and Ecological Studies
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se evalúa una línea base geodésica mediante la implementación de antenas y receptores de bajo costo en sistemas embebidos, así como un receptor geodésico de una frecuencia. Estas mediciones fueron ligadas a una estación de referencia continua de la Red Geodésica Nacional Activa, ubicada en Culiacán, Sinaloa, con el objetivo de determinar la precisión de los equipos de bajo costo estudiados. Para ello se analizan las coordenadas y distancias obtenidas al aplicar el método de posicionamiento diferencial con software académico y comercial. Los resultados presentan diferencias de orden milimétrico entre el posicionamiento con un receptor geodésico y uno de bajo costo para una línea base de 5.1 km que hacen posible la utilización de equipos de bajo costo en trabajos geodésicos y topográficos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it