MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007839499 · doi:10.1109/wsc40007.2019.9004896

On-site Assembly of Modular Building Using Discrete Event Simulation

2019· article· en· W3007839499 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Liu, Asif Mansoor, Brent Kugyelka, Ahmed Bouferguène, Mohamed Al‐Hussein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designPrefabricationDiscrete event simulationComputer scienceModular constructionFactory (object-oriented programming)Process (computing)Event (particle physics)Quality (philosophy)Simulation modelingSystems engineeringIndustrial engineeringEngineeringSimulationCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous development of industrialization in building construction, modular construction and off-site prefabrication methods have been applied much more thoroughly and comprehensively to achieve higher efficiency and better quality control as the major building components are able to be produced in a factory setting, which reduces the influence of uncontrolled factors. This paper, while employing discrete event simulation, uses Simpony.NET tool to model the process of transporting modules and assembling them on the construction site of a future multi-residential project. By adding more details, such as the weather and traffic conditions, the simulation results can become more accurate. In addition, as most simulation models for modular construction processes focus mainly on the assembly of modules on site, this paper also quantified the weather influence in terms of project duration and manpower utilization. Furthermore, the simulation model could also provide a general guide for the comparison of various scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207