MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3007870515 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.189

A190 POST-PARTUM PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS (PBC) AFTER RESOLUTION OF INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY (ICP) IN FIRST NATION’S PATIENTS OF BC: A CASE SERIES

2020· article· en· W3007870515 on OpenAlexaff
Daljeet Chahal, Eric M. Yoshida, Laura Arbour, J. D. Wallach

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholestasis of pregnancyMedicineGastroenterologyCholestasisCholestyramineJaundiceDiscontinuationPregnancyInternal medicineLiver biopsyBile acidBiopsyFetusCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background PBC is a progressive cholestatic disease characterized by destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, peri-portal inflammation and fibrosis. PBC is the leading indication for liver transplantation in First Nations of British Columbia. Diagnosis of PBC during pregnancy is difficult due to clinical overlap with ICP and pregnancy induced immune tolerance (4–6). We present 3 cases of clinically diagnosed ICP in First Nations women who were later diagnosed with PBC post-partum. Aims To investigate the potential relationship between ICP and PBC in the First Nations community of BC. Methods Retrospective review of relevant cases. Results Case 1: A 27-year-old woman with history of ICP at 31 weeks during her 3rd pregnancy and family history of PBC presented with ursodiol and cholestyramine responsive pruritis and jaundice 20 weeks into her 4th pregnancy. Bilirubin was 103 µmol/L, ALP 371 IU/L, ANA and AMA negative. Symptoms and biochemistry remained in remission after delivery at 33 weeks. Discontinuation of medications led to recurrent pruritis 4 months later. Bilirubin was 6 µmol/L, ALP 272 IU/L, GGT 153 IU/L and ALT 204 IU/L. Liver biopsy was consistent with PBC, F1. Pruritis has now been refractory to ursodiol, cholestyramine and rifampin. Case 2: A 30-year-old woman with history of ICP at 20 weeks during 2 prior pregnancies presented with ursodiol responsive pruritis 20 weeks into her 3rd pregnancy. Symptoms and biochemistry remained in remission after delivery at 35 weeks. Post-partum discontinuation of ursodiol led to recurrent pruritis 2 months later. ALP was 876 and AMA >1:640. Re-initiation of ursodiol improved symptoms and biochemical abnormalities. Case 3: A 30-year-old woman with family history of PBC (mother) presented with ursodiol responsive pruritis and jaundice 20 weeks into her 4th pregnancy. Symptoms and biochemistry remained in remission after delivery at 37 weeks. Post-partum discontinuation of ursodiol led to recurrence jaundice 4 months later. Bilirubin was 68, ALP 1279, total cholesterol 7.72, IgM 18.98, ANA >1:640 and AMA 1:320. Jaundice and biochemical abnormalities persisted despite re-initiation of ursodiol. Obeticholic acid has been initiated. Conclusions First Nations communities of BC are disproportionately affected by PBC, due to both genetic and epigenetic phenomena. We present 3 patients who were diagnosed with ICP that resolved post-partum but with the subsequent development of PBC. The intrapartum cholestasis did not have clinical features of PBC during pregnancy. Although not previously reported, ICP may predispose to PBC in this specific community. It remains to be seen if there is a genetic association. Clinicians must remain suspicious of PBC during pregnancy in this population and ongoing monitoring in the post-partum period is paramount. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicPregnancy and Medication Impact→French-language works237,207→