MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3007880717 · doi:10.18174/515075

Resultaten VisPluisVrij Fase 6 : activiteiten en resultaten over de periode 2016-2018 en adviezen

2020· report· nl· W3007880717 on OpenAlexaff
W.J. Strietman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagenl
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrawlingHumanitiesGeographyOperations managementPolitical scienceEngineeringFishing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report provides insight into the results of the activities carried out in phase 6 of the DollyropeFree project under the coordination of Wageningen Economic Research and the Visserij-innovatiecentrum Zuidwest-Nederland. The main focus of those activities has been the further testing of alternative materials and designs that could potentially be used by bottom-trawling fisheries to replace conventional, plastic-based, dollyrope to protect their nets. The overall goal of the DollyropeFree project is to facilitate a process aimed at finding solutions to substantially reduce the annual amount of dollyrope that ends up in the North sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→