MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008032737

Tritium recovery in ITER by radiative plasma terminations

2004· article· en· W3008032737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAPS · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmaTritiumTokamakAtomic physicsRadiationFusion powerRadiative transferCurrent (fluid)Nuclear engineeringMaterials scienceNuclear physicsPhysicsOpticsThermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Planned radiative plasma terminations are examined as a method to recover tritium from plasma-deposited layers in the ITER tokamak. The technique exploits the high energy density of the ITER plasma, which is converted into a quasi-uniform radiation pulse by massive impurity injection that benignly terminates the plasma discharge. The radiation pulse transiently heats all plasma-viewing surfaces in order to desorb the tritium, which is released into the vessel and recovered by pumping. Calculations indicate significant tritium removal at reduced plasma current, ∼6–10 MA, indicating the possibility of routine T recovery during the current rampdown phase of each discharge or during low current tritium recovery discharges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it