MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008067816 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2020.2977015

A Novel Architecture for Early Detection of Negative Output Features in Deep Neural Network Accelerators

2020· article· en· W3008067816 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammadreza Asadikouhanjani, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceSpeedupComputationActivation functionBenchmark (surveying)Deep learningFeature (linguistics)Object detectionDataflowPattern recognition (psychology)Contextual image classificationArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceReduction (mathematics)Network architectureParallel computingImage (mathematics)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) perform billions of computations in applications such as image classification, object detection, and image segmentation. In most well-known DNNs, an activation function follows a convolutional or a fully connected layer. Several popular activation functions involve setting all negative inputs to zero. In this brief, we propose a novel architecture in which the activation function is merged with the prior computational layer. Our proposed dataflow can reduce the computations needed to generate a specific output feature in convolutional and fully connected layers by reordering the computation to achieve early detection of the sign of the output feature. In addition, our computation engine supports zero computation skipping, which further accelerates the layer computation. In this brief, we build on a state-of-the-art DNN accelerator and modify it to perform early detection of negative output features. When compared to the original design, our method achieves a speedup of ×2.19 and reduces energy consumption by ×1.94. The average reduction in the number of multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations is 10.64% and the average reduction in the number of the load operations is 3.86%. These improvements are achieved while maintaining classification accuracy in two popular benchmark networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207