MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008156814 · doi:10.24933/horizontes.v38i1.906

Capstone courses across disciplines: an exploratory study of a pedagogical genre

2020· article· pt· W3008156814 on OpenAlex
Flavia Renon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHorizontes · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapstoneExploratory researchSociologyHumanitiesPedagogyArtSocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No ensino superior, cursos Capstone são definidos como Práticas de Alto Impacto. No entanto, no contexto educacional Canadense atual, pouco se sabe sobre sua natureza, propósito e aplicação. Este estudo examina como instrutores de práticas de alto impacto organizam e comunicam seu entendimento das funções e propósitos de tais práticas ao longo do currículo do curso. Ao usar o procedimento de análise de gênero de movimentos retóricos e passos (SWALES, 1990), do Inglês para Fins Específicos (ESP), este estudo investiga as categorias comunicativas, ou “movimentos”, e características léxico-gramaticais que distinguem o currículo de práticas de alto impacto de outras práticas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it