MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Variational Inference of Finite Generalized Gaussian Mixture Models

2019· article· en· W3008182123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpectation–maximization algorithmMixture modelComputer scienceGaussianInferenceEstimatorArtificial intelligencePosterior probabilityAlgorithmPrior probabilityImage segmentationGenerative modelPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematical optimizationImage (mathematics)MathematicsMaximum likelihoodGenerative grammarBayesian probabilityStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a variational learning framework to analyze finite g eneralized G aussian m ixture models (GGMM). The model incorporates several mixtures that are widely used in signal and image processing applications. The motivation behind this work is the shape flexibility characteristics of the generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD) because of which it can be applied to different types of data. We present a method to evaluate the posterior distribution and Bayes estimators using the variational expectation-maximization algorithm. The effective number of components of the GGMM is determined automatically. The test results show the adequacy of the proposed algorithm by applying it to medical, astrological, and image segmentation applications; while comparing it with various other approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207